Peer Review Process
The integrity and credibility of research published by MakeTruth.org are underpinned by a stringent and transparent peer review process. This critical evaluation by independent experts ensures the scientific rigor, methodological soundness, and ethical conduct of all submitted work before it is made public.
Our Commitment to Quality
Our peer review system is designed to:
- Ensure Validity: Verify the accuracy, reliability, and scientific validity of research findings.
- Enhance Clarity: Improve the clarity, coherence, and overall presentation of manuscripts.
- Identify Gaps: Detect any methodological flaws, gaps in literature, or potential biases.
- Promote Ethical Conduct: Uphold the highest standards of research ethics, including proper attribution and data handling.
The Peer Review Workflow
1. Submission & Initial Assessment
Authors submit their manuscript. Our editorial team conducts an initial check for scope, completeness, and adherence to submission guidelines.
2. Editor Assignment
If deemed suitable, the manuscript is assigned to a relevant section editor with expertise in the subject area.
3. Invitation to Reviewers
The editor invites 2-3 external experts (peers) from our academic network to review the manuscript based on their expertise and lack of conflicts of interest.
4. Peer Review
Reviewers critically evaluate the manuscript for originality, methodology, results, discussion, and adherence to ethical standards. This is typically a double-blind review process.
5. Editorial Decision
Based on reviewer feedback, the editor makes a decision: Accept, Minor Revisions, Major Revisions, or Reject.
6. Revision & Resubmission (if applicable)
Authors revise their manuscript addressing reviewer comments and resubmit. The revised manuscript may undergo further review.
7. Final Acceptance & Publication
Once all revisions are satisfactory, the manuscript is formally accepted and prepared for publication.
Reviewer Guidelines
Our reviewers are provided with clear guidelines to ensure constructive, fair, and timely evaluations. We emphasize confidentiality, objectivity, and the identification of both strengths and weaknesses in submitted work.
For detailed guidelines for authors and reviewers, please refer to our dedicated submission portal or contact the editorial office.